DARWINISM’S UNSCIENTIFIC FORMULA

Plentiful Muddy Water + A Long Time + Many Coincidences = Civilization

When the subject of evolution comes up, many people imagine that this is a scientific problem—and that for anyone less knowledgeable than scientists, Darwinism is impossible to understand. They assume it’s pointless to argue the issue, one way or the other. Indeed, Darwinists employ Latin words and scientific terms generally unfamiliar to the public in order to encourage this mistaken idea. They engage in complicated descriptions and frequently resort to demagoguery and hollow slogans in order to give the impression they are discussing a highly scientific matter.

In fact, however, Darwinism’s basic claim is completely unscientific, and its logical poverty is so obvious that even primary school age children can see it. According to Darwinism, in some unexplained manner, the first cell supposedly formed in the Earth’s primeval environment, in a pool of muddy water. And out of that single cell, a literally endless series of coincidences later gave rise to animals, plants, human beings and civilizations. In other words, all of mankind, as well as the entire plant and animal kingdoms, are supposedly the work of an ideal quantity of mud, a long period of time and plentiful coincidences.

One would have to lack any facility to understand and reason in order to believe that through coincidences, mud eventually gave rise to civilizations. Anyone capable of thinking and drawing appropriate conclusions can’t possibly be taken in by Darwinist errors.

According to Darwinists, who are suffering from an obvious logical deficiency, these materials, each one of which is unconscious, gave rise to human beings possessed of reason and conscience, who think, love, feel compassion, possess sound judgment, produce paintings and statues, compose symphonies, write novels, build skyscrapers, construct nuclear reactors, discover the causes of diseases and manufacture drugs to cure them, or engage in politics. They claim that when sufficient time had passed, lions, tigers, rabbits, deer, elephants, cats, dogs, moths, flies, crocodiles and birds all evolved by chance from muddy water.

A whole range of fruits and vegetables, with their own unique tastes and smells—oranges, strawberries, bananas, apples, grapes, tomatoes, peppers—flowers with their matchless appearances and other plants all emerged from that same mud. In short, ever since Darwin’s time, countless articles, papers, films, newspaper reports, magazine articles and television programs have repeated the evolutionist scenario in which all of life emerged by chance from mud.

In other words, if you ask a Darwinist “How did our civilization arise?” or, “How did such a wide range of life forms come into being?” or, “How did mankind come into existence?” the essential answer you will receive is this: Coincidences gave rise to all these things from mud, over the course of time.

The Darwinist scenario of “life emerging from mud” can no longer deceive people. Any rational person can immediately see the nonsensical premise of the theory of evolution.

One would doubtless need to be devoid of reason or lack any facility for understanding in order to believe such a tale. Yet surprisingly, that very irrational and illogical theory has had its adherents for many years and is still being propagated constantly under a scientific guise.

The Lies of Darwinism Have Been Unmasked

Scientific evidence has revealed that the “sequence” of equine evolution, long portrayed as one of the strongest pieces of evidence for evolution, is untrue—and wholly imaginary.

The theory of evolution, first proposed under the primitive conditions of the 19th century, has been disproved by advances in science and technology. It has been recognized that Darwin’s claims are totally unrealistic:

Natural selection and mutations, cited as the mechanisms that drive the process of evolution, have no effects of the kind envisaged by Darwinists. In short, it is impossible for them to give rise to new species.

The final death blow to Darwinism was dealt by the fossil record. Darwin claimed that all the millions of different life forms had come into being through descent from a supposed single common ancestor.

In order for his claim to be verified, there should be traces in the fossil record—an irrefutable document of natural history—of this supposed primitive ancestor and of the various life forms that developed from it. For example, if all mammals were descended from reptiles, as evolutionists maintain, then there would have to be fossil remains of a series of half-mammalian, half-reptilian life forms.

To date, millions of fossils, belonging to a great many species, have been unearthed during excavations. Yet not a single one showing a transition between species has ever been found. Every fossil ever found shows that each living thing emerged suddenly, with all its characteristics complete. In other words, every species of plant and animal was created.

Confronted by this fact, evolutionists have resorted to various falsehoods. They have produced hoaxes—counterfeit, artificial fossils that have come to be regarded as disgraces to paleontology. They have tried to deceive the lay public by tampering with genuine fossils of extinct life forms and inventing a series of imaginary scenarios. One of the best known of them is the so-called “evolution of the horse.”

Fossils belonging to entirely different species that once lived in India, South America, North America and Europe were arranged in order of size—from small to large—in the light of evolutionist imaginations. So far, different researchers have come up with more than 20 different equine evolution scenarios. There is no agreement among them regarding all these completely different family trees. The one point they commonly agree upon is their belief that a dog-like creature known as Eohippus (or Hyracotherium) that lived in the Eocene epoch (54 to 37 million years ago) was the very first ancestor of today’s horses. However, Eohippus—portrayed as the ancestor of the horse and that became extinct millions of years ago—is almost identical to the present-day animal known as the hyrax, which looks nothing like a horse and is totally unrelated to that species.

Moreover, it has been established that breeds of horse living today have also been discovered in the same rock strata as Eohippus. (See Francis Hitching’s The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, New York: Ticknor and Fields, 1982, pp. 30-31.) This means that the horse and its supposed ancestor were both living at the same time, which proves that the horse never underwent any such process as evolution.

The invalidity of the “equine series” proposed by evolutionists also applies to birds, fish, reptiles and mammals, in short, to all living things, to their supposedly common ancestors and supposed family trees. It has been determined that every fossil species suggested as being the ancestor of some other living thing either belongs to an independent extinct life form or is the result of evolutionists tampering with fossils of the species in question.

Darwinism has been exposed as the most wide-ranging and astonishing deception in the world’s history. That millions have been taken in by this deception, as if hypnotized, and have been influenced by all of Darwinism’s illogical claims, is truly miraculous. The support lent to the theory of evolution and the acceptance it has enjoyed up to now are the result of tricks played on mankind by satan, who urges vast numbers of people towards Darwinism.

Until recently, no one had the courage to unmask this ruse of satan’s and to publicize the true facts. But in the present century, the response to this deception has finally been laid out in full detail, and the public has been made fully aware of the state of affairs. By the will of God, the collapse of Darwinism has advanced beyond any point of recovery. Indeed, that is the fundamental reason for the panic in the Darwinian

global empire.

PERNYATAAN PENTING MENGENAI HARUN YAHYA

Karena perjuangan intelektual anti-Darwinis, anti-komunis dan anti-Masoniknya, Adnan Oktar telah bertahun-tahun menjadi sasaran persekongkolan dan fitnah oleh kekuatan terselubung tertentu. Namun, pengadilan selalu menyatakannya tidak bersalah dari tuduhan tak berdasar ini, dan semua itu telah terungkap sebagai makar dan fitnah.

1. Adnan Oktar dikurung di dalam penjara sendirian selama sembilan bulan dan kemudian ditahan lagi selama 10 bulan di sebuah rumah sakit jiwa yang menjadi rumah bagi 300 penghuni paling berbahaya yang telah melakukan pembunuhan. Semuanya ini karena Adnan Oktar pernah berkata “Saya seorang anggota dari bangsa Turki dan dari kaum Ibrahim.” Tujuh orang terbunuh oleh narapidana selama masa penahanannya di sana.

2. Setelah ditahan di dalam penjara dan rumah sakit jiwa selama keseluruhan 19 bulan, Adnan Oktar dinyatakan tidak bersalah dan dibebaskan oleh pengadilan ketika pihak Jaksa Penuntut menyatakan bahwa “tidak terdapat pelanggaran pidana dalam pekataannya.” Akan tetapi, karena laporan kejiwaan yang dikeluarkan mengenai dirinya maka ia selama bertahun-tahun di depan umum digambarkan mengidap penyakit jiwa dan terhalangi hak-haknya seperti memilih atau dipilih, menikah, bekerja untuk negara atau membeli barang. Persekongkolan ini juga akhirnya gagal ketika Rumah Sakit Militer menyatakan ketidakabsahan laporan tersebut..

3. Adnan Oktar ditahan tanpa alasan yang benar pada tahun 1991, dan para anggota Ergenekon, sebuah deep state (negara di dalam negara, negara terselubung) beraliran komunis yang telah menyusupi negara Turki, telah mengatur agar kokain dapat ditemukan di dalam aliran darahnya setelah dicampur dengan makanannya di gedung Markas Besar Keamanan. Ini telah dibuktikan oleh Lembaga Kedokteran Forensik.

Adnan Oktar dinyatakan tidak bersalah dan bebas dari tuduhan ketika pengadilan memutuskan bahwa itu adalah sebuah persekongkolan.

4. Adnan Oktar telah mengalami 9 kali upaya pembunuhan.

5. Pada tahun 1999, Adnan Oktar dan beragam orang dari kalangan BAV (Yayasan Penelitian Ilmu Pengetahuan) ditahan polisi berdasarkan perintah Adil Serdar Sacan, yang ia sendiri kini sedang ditahan atas tuduhan menjadi anggota organisasi teroris Ergenekon. Mereka yang dimasukkan ke dalam penjara disiksa oleh petugas di Departemen Keamanan, atas perintah dan dukungan dari Adil Serdar Sacan. Akibat penyiksaan itu, para tahanan dipaksa menandatangani pernyataan-pernyataan tidak benar yang telah dipersiapkan sebelumnya.

6. Seorang wartawan bernama Tuncay Ozkan, yang sekarang juga di dalam penjara atas dakwaan menjadi anggota organisasi teroris komunis Ergenekon, adalah orang yang telah mempersiapkan sebelumnya pernyataan-pernyataan yang ditandatangani secara paksa oleh para tahanan dan yang memberikannya kepada Departemen Keamanan. Setelah pernyataan itu ditandatangani di bawah paksaan, pernyataan palsu yang ditandatangani ini dikirimkan kembali kepada Tuncay Ozkan oleh Adil Serdar Sacan, dan Ozkan lalu menggunakannya untuk melancarkan pencemaran nama baik para anggota BAV dengan laporan-laporan berhalaman penuh di surat-surat kabar setiap hari dan liputan-liputan di televisi. Ini menyingkap dengan jelas dan tak terbantahkan bahwa orang-orang di dalam negara komunis terselubung itulah yang berada di balik persekongkolan terhadap Adnan Oktar dan BAV yang telah berlangsung sedemikian bertahun-tahun.

7. Di bawah pengaruh laporan polisi yang dipersiapkan berdasarkan pernyataan-pernyataan ini, proses pengadilan dimulai dan sejumlah terdakwa dijatuhi 3 tahun penjara. Bersama Adnan Oktar, tiga wanita muda, tamatan universitas yang belum pernah melihat bagian dalam sebuah penjara atau pos polisi atau bahkan menerima peringatan tertulis karena berkendaraan melampaui batas kecepatan, dijatuhi pula 3 tahun

8. Adnan Oktar secara sengaja dan tidak benar difitnah dengan permasalahan seksualitas, sesuatu yang bagi orang merupakan hal yang secara khusus peka, dengan tujuan mempengaruhi pendapat umum. Mereka yang bertanggung jawab atas fitnah ini yang menyatakan bahwa seorang wanita dipaksa dengan todongan senjata agar melakukan hubungan badan dan ini direkam oleh kamera, telah melakukan kekeliruan besar. MEREKA GAGAL MEMPERHITUNGKAN PERBEDAAN-PERBEDAAN antara rumah yang mereka nyatakan dihuni oleh Adnan Oktar dan rumah di mana rekaman kamera rahasia dibuat. Palang rumah di mana rekaman itu dibuat posisinya tergantung lurus ke bawah, padahal tidak terdapat palang di rumah Adnan Oktar (langit-langit blok berongga). Di rumah Adnan Oktar jendela-jendela sangatlah besar, membentang dari lantai hingga ke langit-langit, sedangkan di rumah tempat rekaman dibuat jendelanya kecil, berupa plastik PVC segiempat. Agar rumah Adnan Oktar seperti yang dimaksud, rumah itu harus diruntuhkan dan dibangun ulang keseluruhannya. Semua bukti ini dibeberkan di film video yang diperlihatkan di depan komisi pengadilan, jaksa penuntut, pengacara, dan saksi ahli resmi, dan pengadilan menyatakan Adnan Oktar tidak bersalah atas tuduhan bohong ini berdasarkan ketidaksesuaian bukti antara kedua tempat tinggal tersebut.

9. Dalam pendapat resmi terkininya mengenai perkara ini, di mana Adnan Oktar dan 5 orang dari kalangan BAV dijatuhi hukuman penjara, Jaksa Penuntut Umum menyatakan bahwa:

* Seluruh terdakwa, termasuk Adnan Oktar, telah dinyatakan bebas, tidak bersalah dalam perkara tersebut;

* Pernyataan-pernyataan yang dibuat di bawah paksaan dan tanpa kehadiran pengacara adalah cacat secara hukum, dan selain itu hal ini telah diterima oleh pengadilan yang mendengarkan perkara tersebut;

* Dan tidak terdapat bukti di dalam berkas perkara yang mendukung dakwaan-dakwaan tersebut,

Dan oleh karena itu MEMINTA AGAR PARA TERDAKWA DIBEBASKAN.

Adnan Oktar tidak pernah melakukan pelanggaran pidana, dan ia menolak dakwaan ini. Namun ia tentunya menghormati keputusan pengadilan.

Adnan Oktar telah dinyatakan tidak bersalah di dalam hati seluruh orang yang berakal dan seluruh dunia Islam dan bangsa Turki. Tak seorang pun di Turki percaya bahwa ia adalah pemimpin kelompok kejahatan. Ia adalah orang yang menekuni ilmu, seorang penulis yang dikenal di seluruh dunia. Ia mengajarkan cinta, kedamaian, saling menghargai dan belas kasih, dan menganjurkan akhlak mulia. Kebohongan dan persekongkolan tidak pernah merintangi perjuangan intelektual Adnan Oktar walau bagaimana pun, dan tidak pula semua itu akan menghalanginya di masa mendatang. Ia akan dengan berani, tanpa henti dan tekad kuat melanjutkan kegiatan anti-materialis, anti-komunis dan anti-Darwinisnya yang menyeru Turki kepada persatuan dan kesatuan.
Disalin dari Harun Yahya.com